About the journal

Annotation: Today, when the process of making technical and technological decisions is deeply influenced by computer-aided design methods — especially the SolidWorks software family, which can rightfully be associated with artificial intelligence — the number of factors and features in technical solutions and their development up to the technical supersystem level becomes so significant that it demands localized consistency with definitions, principles, and identification methods of the entire hierarchy of technical solutions: from a local technical solution with non-adjustable technical and technological links (a subsystem), to a complex conglomerate of local technical solutions (a supersystem). It must be acknowledged that, for the first time in global practice, such classification optimization of technical solution types was achieved in the publications of a modern specialist who equally masters the methodologies and techniques of classical design and computer programming — Dmytro Sumtsov. As challenges related to the development, modernization, and optimization of technology grow more complex, isolated local solutions no longer satisfy clients. They seek paths toward the Ideal Final Result (IFR), and reality pushes them to look for compositional, integrative, and complex solutions — in full alignment with the terminology and definitions optimized by Dmytro Sumtsov in his recent publications. Issues of identifying all types and levels of technical solutions primarily affect the systemic protection of created and developing intellectual property — both at the level of active and effective subsystems and at the level of active accumulators of properties within technical supersystems.

Annotation: Modern innovative technologies require new materials that combine high thermal conductivity and high electrical conductivity in order to significantly enhance technical performance. A new composite material has been invented and developed, which possesses both high thermal conductivity and high electrical conductivity. The new composite material is capable of absorbing and dissipating significant amounts of energy within very short time intervals. The material is capable of absorbing and transmitting significant amounts of energy over a distance while maintaining maximum mechanical strength. It demonstrates exceptional reliability in preserving precise geometric shapes under the influence of high concentrations of temperature, energy, and other harmful or extreme impacts. Formulation of the new composite material as a product: ● a composite material featuring an advanced three-dimensional (volumetric) structure composed of numerous identical multi-layered spherical shells encasing spherical cores; the cores with shells (capsules) are bonded together through a series of sequential technological processes and possess an equivalent contact structure form between all capsules. ● the composite material possesses properties of ultra-high thermal conductivity and ultra-high electrical conductivity; ● the composite material exhibits high mechanical strength, is resistant to the development of internal mechanical and thermal stresses, and consequently, to the occurrence of internal deformations; ● the composite material is capable of withstanding high pressures and, under the influence of these pressures, can cause at least some of its components to enter a state of cold-flow behavior. This allows for the calibration of the three-dimensional geometric shape of the structure and ensures very precise geometric dimensions of the structure with a high degree of repeatability.

Annotation: Background: The study explores physiological differences between muscle hypertrophy and strength adaptation. Methods: Literature review, comparative analysis of training variables, and load modeling. Result: Key parameters (volume, intensity, frequency) were identified. Conclusion: Hypertrophy requires moderate intensity with high volume, while strength relies on maximal intensity. Periodization enhances outcomes.

Annotation: As the practice of the innovation process shows, for a statistically average idea generator and later inventor, much in the successful promotion of his ideas or inventions is determined by the basic training that he received in his time, starting from high school, continued to receive in a higher educational institution and, what is especially important, as it seems to the author of this publication, in special targeted courses for advanced training and new professional orientation that arose in the conditions of the transition of social production to high and digital technologies. Of particular importance for the progressive and fruitful development of the innovation process in general and especially the innovation process in the USA is the fact that a multidisciplinary specialist who has knowledge and skills in basic exact disciplines and in the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving and the Algorithm for Solving Inventive Problems must also know the specifics of technical standards and restrictions adopted in the USA in order to successfully adapt them for use in the conditions of each specific project. Numerous attempts to find a curriculum that would produce a well-rounded technical specialist have encountered many parallel problems. The Theory of Inventive Problem Solving and the Algorithm for Solving Inventive Problems are the most important complex analytical professional engineering tools for developing projects of any complexity in the innovation process For successful and effective application of the specified tools, it is necessary, in addition to comprehensive and deep engineering knowledge and skills, to have skills and positive experience in creatively adapting the laws and postulates of the theory and algorithm in a real innovation process.